<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Public Option and American Journalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rasmuskleisnielsen.net/2009/10/21/the-public-option-and-american-journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rasmuskleisnielsen.net/2009/10/21/the-public-option-and-american-journalism/</link>
	<description>an online business card, entry point, and space for musings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 12:50:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rasmus Kleis Nielsen</title>
		<link>http://rasmuskleisnielsen.net/2009/10/21/the-public-option-and-american-journalism/#comment-397</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rasmus Kleis Nielsen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rasmuskleisnielsen.net/?p=334#comment-397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeff, I very much respect that you have taken on directly the challenge of thinking about solutions to the problems facing news work today, but on that particular point, I do think that to call public subsidy &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/19/giving-up-on-the-news-business/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;desperate&quot; and &quot;giving up on the news business&quot; as you do&lt;/a&gt; ignores both the history of the news business in this country, and the forms in which it is practices elsewhere. I can live without the &quot;staggering&quot;, but the &quot;dangerous misconception&quot; and &quot;ignorance&quot; parts I stand by.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, I very much respect that you have taken on directly the challenge of thinking about solutions to the problems facing news work today, but on that particular point, I do think that to call public subsidy <a href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/10/19/giving-up-on-the-news-business/" rel="nofollow">&#8220;desperate&#8221; and &#8220;giving up on the news business&#8221; as you do</a> ignores both the history of the news business in this country, and the forms in which it is practices elsewhere. I can live without the &#8220;staggering&#8221;, but the &#8220;dangerous misconception&#8221; and &#8220;ignorance&#8221; parts I stand by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Jarvis</title>
		<link>http://rasmuskleisnielsen.net/2009/10/21/the-public-option-and-american-journalism/#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Jarvis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rasmuskleisnielsen.net/?p=334#comment-395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;dangerous misconception that rests on a staggering ignorance&quot;?

Oh, come now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;dangerous misconception that rests on a staggering ignorance&#8221;?</p>
<p>Oh, come now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

